Skip to content

Conversation

@hashim21223445
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Uncontrolled Recursion
SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
  60  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
@semanticdiff-com
Copy link

semanticdiff-com bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Changed Files
File Status
  package.json  0% smaller

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @hashim21223445, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, updates the eslint dependency to a newer version. The primary purpose of this upgrade is to mitigate a known security vulnerability, ensuring the project benefits from the latest security patches and maintains robust code quality standards.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: Upgraded the eslint dependency from version "8.57.0" to "9.26.0" to address a medium-severity "Uncontrolled Recursion" vulnerability (SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420).

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@snyk-io
Copy link

snyk-io bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades eslint from version 8.57.0 to 9.26.0 to address a security vulnerability. While the security fix is important, this is a major version upgrade that introduces significant breaking changes. As noted in the review comment, ESLint v9 requires a different configuration format, and the project's current ESLint setup, including the @ljharb/eslint-config package, is incompatible with this new version. This will likely break the build. Manual intervention is required to migrate the ESLint configuration before this PR can be safely merged.

"eclint": "^2.8.1",
"es-value-fixtures": "^1.4.2",
"eslint": "8.57.0",
"eslint": "9.26.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Upgrading eslint to a new major version (from 8.x to 9.x) introduces significant breaking changes. ESLint v9 uses a new configuration file (eslint.config.js) by default and has deprecated the .eslintrc format. The project's dependency @ljharb/eslint-config at version ^21.1.1 is not compatible with ESLint v9, which will cause the lint script to fail.

To resolve this, the ESLint configuration must be migrated to the new format, and all related plugins and configurations must be updated to versions compatible with ESLint v9 before this change can be merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants